Ah, the trick to googling it was to leave out the pronouns. I googled specialiter singulariter abelard and once it became clear it was from Heloise, cut to the chase with specialiter singulariter heloise.
The reason, amusingly enough, that I googled without the pronouns was that I thought that they were wrong; I was unfamiliar with the cases used in Latin for epistolary greetings and couldn't figure out what that nominative was doing there. I have learned lots in doing this research! (Note to self: dative for the "to", nominative for the "from".)
That is amusing, as I remember just enough Latin and have just enough familiarity with medieval philosophy to have enough of a vague sense of the meaning as to consider each word important to the whole. Also, Googlebooks is not accessible, so I don't search there: the pages you linked to are totally lacking any of the actual page content being search for.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
kestrell
no subject
Date: 2013-08-21 03:37 pm (UTC)The reason, amusingly enough, that I googled without the pronouns was that I thought that they were wrong; I was unfamiliar with the cases used in Latin for epistolary greetings and couldn't figure out what that nominative was doing there. I have learned lots in doing this research! (Note to self: dative for the "to", nominative for the "from".)
no subject
Date: 2013-08-21 05:18 pm (UTC)