Oxford Dictionaries Online available to institutions and individuals

Via Teleread comes this announcement:

Oxford University Press is proud to announce its brand new modern English dictionary and language reference service,
Oxford Dictionaries Online
http://oxforddictionaries.com/?attempted=true

The home page also features a Word of the Day --today's word is
Pecksniffian
http://oxforddictionaries.com/view/entry/m_en_us1276416
--and other word entertainments, such as a newsletter and an examination of
the rise of twitter and tweet
http://oxforddictionaries.com/page/423
and resources for improving your writing.

Individuals can subscribe through either an annual fee of $49.95 or a monthly feeof $7.95, and there appears to be a
free thirty-day trial available
http://oxforddictionaries.com/page/freetrials_us/free-30day-trials
but only for institutions and organizations.
This means that I was foiled in my attempt to try out the accessibility of the site before actually subscribing--if another screen reader user ends up trying this out before me, could you post about your access experience?

Steven Pinker on moral panics and mass media

Kes: I love the line about the brain not eing a blob of clay--it sums up a lot of my frustration with the way in which the term "neuroplasticity" is tossed about. Sorry kids, there are no shortcuts to becoming smarter except working at becoming smarter.

"Mind Over Mass Media"
From The New York Times
Published: June 10, 2010
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/11/opinion/11Pinker.html?ref=opinion

Block quote start
Critics of new media sometimes use science itself to press their case, citing research that shows how “experience can change the brain.” But cognitive neuroscientists roll their eyes at such talk. Yes, every time we learn a fact or skill the wiring of the brain changes; it’s not as if the information is stored in the
pancreas. But the existence of neural plasticity does not mean the brain is a blob of clay pounded into shape by experience.

Experience does not revamp the basic information-processing capacities of the brain. Speed-reading programs have long claimed to do just that, but the verdict
was rendered by Woody Allen after he read “War and Peace” in one sitting: “It was about Russia.” Genuine multitasking, too, has been exposed as a myth,
not just by laboratory studies but by the familiar sight of an S.U.V. undulating between lanes as the driver cuts deals on his cellphone.

Moreover, as the psychologists Christopher Chabris and Daniel Simons show in their new book “The Invisible Gorilla: And Other Ways Our Intuitions Deceive
Us,” the effects of experience are highly specific to the experiences themselves. If you train people to do one thing (recognize shapes, solve math puzzles,
find hidden words), they get better at doing that thing, but almost nothing else. Music doesn’t make you better at math, conjugating Latin doesn’t make
you more logical, brain-training games don’t make you smarter. Accomplished people don’t bulk up their brains with intellectual calisthenics; they immerse
themselves in their fields. Novelists read lots of novels, scientists read lots of science.
Block quote end

Some thoughts on Jose Saramago's _Blindness_

In any piece of fiction or nonfiction which discusses blindness, one can typically classify the representations of blind people into one of three categories:
( continued below cut )